TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Town of Hempstead Employees Federal Credit Union vs Latvian Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Town of Hempstead Employees Federal Credit Union

North Baldwin, New York · $100 million – $1 billion

56of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Latvian Federal Credit Union

Melville, New York · Under $100 million in assets

88of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureTown of Hempstead Employees Federal Credit UnionLatvian Federal Credit Union
TellerScore5688 (stronger)
Capital cushion30100 (stronger)
Loan quality54100 (stronger)
Earnings47 (stronger)42
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage87100 (stronger)
Peer percentile13th85th
Total assets$149.4M$1.8M
Deposits / shares$136.7M$1.4M
Capital ratio8.04%25.25% (stronger)
Problem loans1.39%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.25%0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets0.68% (stronger)0.55%
Loans ÷ deposits40.3%20.4% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits6.8%0.0% (stronger)
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Latvian Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 56). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Town of Hempstead Employees Federal Credit Union leads on 1 and Latvian Federal Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions