Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Toyota Financial Savings Bank vs Boulder Dam Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Toyota Financial Savings Bank | Boulder Dam Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 73 | 93 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 61 | 98 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 93 | 93 |
| Earnings | 36 | 79 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 95 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 83rd | 97th |
| Total assets | $16.8B | $871.5M |
| Deposits / shares | $14.3B | $749.9M |
| Capital ratio | 11.06% | 14.81% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.20% (stronger) | 0.21% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.20% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.39% | 1.46% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 64.2% | 48.4% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 16.3% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 6.0% | — |
Boulder Dam Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (93 vs 73). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Toyota Financial Savings Bank leads on 1 and Boulder Dam Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.