Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Tri Boro Federal Credit Union vs Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Tri Boro Federal Credit Union | Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 76 | 93 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 95 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 69 | 87 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 44 | 83 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 82 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 91 | 98 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 68th | 94th |
| Total assets | $130.6M | $76.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $111.4M | $64.6M |
| Capital ratio | 14.50% | 15.35% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.94% | 0.40% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.31% | 0.19% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.59% | 1.57% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 78.0% | 38.3% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 2.0% | 0.8% (stronger) |
| Offices | 3 | 6 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 3.3% | — |
Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (93 vs 76). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Tri Boro Federal Credit Union leads on 0 and Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union on 7. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.