Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Truist Bank vs Cedar Hill National Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Truist Bank | Cedar Hill National Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 63 | 93 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 48 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 76 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 66 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 49 | 50 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 93 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 61st | 94th |
| Total assets | $548.3B | $16.0M |
| Deposits / shares | $419.2B | $2.0M |
| Capital ratio | 9.82% | 67.56% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.72% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.55% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.16% | 4.79% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 78.0% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 44.9% (stronger) | 87.5% |
| Offices | 1,908 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 14,404 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 34.4 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 40.8% | — |
Cedar Hill National Bank has the higher TellerScore (93 vs 63). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Truist Bank leads on 1 and Cedar Hill National Bank on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.