Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Trustmark Bank vs First Cahawba Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Trustmark Bank | First Cahawba Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 62 | 74 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 54 | 58 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 62 | 96 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 73 (stronger) | 65 |
| Funding & liquidity | 49 | 62 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 86 | 98 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 35th | 57th |
| Total assets | $19.2B | $205.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $16.2B | $186.6M |
| Capital ratio | 10.40% | 10.81% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 1.14% | 0.12% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.12% | -0.05% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.33% (stronger) | 1.13% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 86.7% | 78.7% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 37.0% | 33.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 163 | 5 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 191 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 11.8 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 14.7% | 21.4% |
First Cahawba Bank has the higher TellerScore (74 vs 62). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Trustmark Bank leads on 1 and First Cahawba Bank on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.