Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Trustmark Bank vs FSNB, National Association
Metric by metric
| Measure | Trustmark Bank | FSNB, National Association |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 62 | 96 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 54 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 62 | 88 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 73 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 49 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 86 | 92 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 35th | 99th |
| Total assets | $19.2B | $478.3M |
| Deposits / shares | $16.2B | $369.7M |
| Capital ratio | 10.40% | 17.51% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 1.14% | 0.36% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.12% (stronger) | 1.02% |
| Return on assets | 1.33% | 3.46% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 86.7% | 39.2% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 37.0% | 8.2% (stronger) |
| Offices | 163 | 66 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 191 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 11.8 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 14.7% | — |
FSNB, National Association has the higher TellerScore (96 vs 62). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Trustmark Bank leads on 1 and FSNB, National Association on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.