TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

United Farmers State Bank vs Mayo Employees Federal Credit Union

Bank

United Farmers State Bank

Adams, Minnesota · $100 million – $1 billion

75of 100
Strong

Credit union

Mayo Employees Federal Credit Union

Rochester, Minnesota · $1 billion – $10 billion

98of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureUnited Farmers State BankMayo Employees Federal Credit Union
TellerScore7598 (stronger)
Capital cushion5399 (stronger)
Loan quality8998 (stronger)
Earnings100 (stronger)92
Funding & liquidity50100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage93100 (stronger)
Peer percentile61st100th
Total assets$233.8M$1.5B
Deposits / shares$181.6M$1.3B
Capital ratio10.33%14.90% (stronger)
Problem loans0.33%0.05% (stronger)
Net charge-offs-0.00% (stronger)0.02%
Return on assets2.12% (stronger)1.80%
Loans ÷ deposits112.0%55.3% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits13.9%6.2% (stronger)
Offices37
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—18.7%

Mayo Employees Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (98 vs 75). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), United Farmers State Bank leads on 2 and Mayo Employees Federal Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions