Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
United Mississippi Bank vs Ferguson Federal Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | United Mississippi Bank | Ferguson Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 75 (stronger) | 33 |
| Capital cushion | 60 (stronger) | 46 |
| Loan quality | 94 (stronger) | 0 |
| Earnings | 66 (stronger) | 18 |
| Funding & liquidity | 71 | 79 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 (stronger) | 41 |
| Peer percentile | 61st | 2nd |
| Total assets | $560.7M | $94.2M |
| Deposits / shares | $478.9M | $83.1M |
| Capital ratio | 11.04% (stronger) | 9.63% |
| Problem loans | 0.19% (stronger) | 3.79% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.05% (stronger) | 1.25% |
| Return on assets | 1.15% (stronger) | -0.05% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 85.7% | 81.2% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 18.6% | 9.4% (stronger) |
| Offices | 13 | 6 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 22.6% |
United Mississippi Bank has the higher TellerScore (75 vs 33). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), United Mississippi Bank leads on 5 and Ferguson Federal Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.