TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

VeraBank, National Association vs Incommons Bank, N.A.

Bank

VeraBank, National Association

Henderson, Texas · $1 billion – $10 billion

72of 100
Strong

Bank

Incommons Bank, N.A.

Mexia, Texas · $100 million – $1 billion

73of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureVeraBank, National AssociationIncommons Bank, N.A.
TellerScore7273 (stronger)
Capital cushion60 (stronger)52
Loan quality6886 (stronger)
Earnings8484
Funding & liquidity76 (stronger)67
Problem-loan coverage90 (stronger)89
Peer percentile66th53rd
Total assets$4.6B$277.6M
Deposits / shares$4.0B$245.8M
Capital ratio11.03% (stronger)10.20%
Problem loans0.96%0.41% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.10%0.04% (stronger)
Return on assets1.61% (stronger)1.60%
Loans ÷ deposits68.8% (stronger)79.0%
Uninsured deposits29.0%28.1% (stronger)
Offices426
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—34.8%

Incommons Bank, N.A. has the higher TellerScore (73 vs 72). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), VeraBank, National Association leads on 3 and Incommons Bank, N.A. on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions