Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Viking Bank, National Association vs Mid Minnesota Federal Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Viking Bank, National Association | Mid Minnesota Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 70 (stronger) | 67 |
| Capital cushion | 42 | 43 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 82 | 86 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 89 (stronger) | 66 |
| Funding & liquidity | 70 (stronger) | 68 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 85 | 90 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 43rd | 41st |
| Total assets | $330.3M | $858.0M |
| Deposits / shares | $283.1M | $766.9M |
| Capital ratio | 9.19% | 9.30% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.53% | 0.43% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.24% |
| Return on assets | 1.72% (stronger) | 1.15% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 90.6% (stronger) | 92.3% |
| Uninsured deposits | 14.4% | 6.1% (stronger) |
| Offices | 3 | 6 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Viking Bank, National Association has the higher TellerScore (70 vs 67). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Viking Bank, National Association leads on 4 and Mid Minnesota Federal Credit Union on 3. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.