Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
VisionBank vs Think Mutual Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | VisionBank | Think Mutual Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 57 | 86 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 50 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 40 | 92 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 45 |
| Funding & liquidity | 43 | 95 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 59 | 98 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 14th | 97th |
| Total assets | $253.9M | $2.2B |
| Deposits / shares | $183.6M | $1.9B |
| Capital ratio | 9.99% | 16.25% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 1.81% | 0.25% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | -0.11% (stronger) | 0.05% |
| Return on assets | 2.13% (stronger) | 0.63% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 121.4% | 64.8% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 21.9% | 5.8% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 9 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 12.2% |
Think Mutual Bank has the higher TellerScore (86 vs 57). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), VisionBank leads on 2 and Think Mutual Bank on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.