Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Wabellco Federal Credit Union vs Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Wabellco Federal Credit Union
Washington, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets
Credit union
Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Wabellco Federal Credit Union | Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 74 | 93 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 45 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 87 |
| Earnings | 51 | 83 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 | 100 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 98 |
| Peer percentile | 49th | 94th |
| Total assets | $12.3M | $76.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $11.2M | $64.6M |
| Capital ratio | 9.54% | 15.35% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.40% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.19% |
| Return on assets | 0.77% | 1.57% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 28.3% (stronger) | 38.3% |
| Uninsured deposits | 1.4% | 0.8% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 6 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (93 vs 74). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Wabellco Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.