TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Wakefern Federal Credit Union vs United Poles Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Wakefern Federal Credit Union

Elizabeth, New Jersey · Under $100 million in assets

99of 100
Very strong

Credit union

United Poles Federal Credit Union

Perth Amboy, New Jersey · Under $100 million in assets

28of 100
Low

Metric by metric

MeasureWakefern Federal Credit UnionUnited Poles Federal Credit Union
TellerScore99 (stronger)28
Capital cushion100 (stronger)20
Loan quality96 (stronger)1
Earnings100 (stronger)41
Funding & liquidity99 (stronger)69
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)28
Peer percentile99th1st
Total assets$12.0M$72.3M
Deposits / shares$9.1M$66.6M
Capital ratio24.31% (stronger)6.95%
Problem loans0.13% (stronger)2.96%
Net charge-offs0.09% (stronger)0.17%
Return on assets2.03% (stronger)0.53%
Loans ÷ deposits42.9% (stronger)91.0%
Uninsured deposits16.4%7.7% (stronger)
Offices13
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—0.0%

Wakefern Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (99 vs 28). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Wakefern Federal Credit Union leads on 6 and United Poles Federal Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions