Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Walden Savings Bank vs Amerasia Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Walden Savings Bank | Amerasia Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 62 | 78 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 52 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 65 (stronger) | 47 |
| Earnings | 60 | 92 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 64 | 64 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 84 | 85 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 27th | 86th |
| Total assets | $1.0B | $1.1B |
| Deposits / shares | $819.6M | $914.0M |
| Capital ratio | 10.19% | 15.12% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 1.05% (stronger) | 1.59% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.03% | 0.02% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.01% | 1.79% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 96.2% | 89.1% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 14.8% (stronger) | 21.9% |
| Offices | 11 | 8 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Amerasia Bank has the higher TellerScore (78 vs 62). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Walden Savings Bank leads on 2 and Amerasia Bank on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.