TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Washington Financial Bank vs I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union

Bank

Washington Financial Bank

Washington, Pennsylvania · $1 billion – $10 billion

81of 100
Strong

Credit union

I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

98of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureWashington Financial BankI.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union
TellerScore8198 (stronger)
Capital cushion97100 (stronger)
Loan quality8598 (stronger)
Earnings6691 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity5199 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage95100 (stronger)
Peer percentile91st98th
Total assets$1.4B$15.4M
Deposits / shares$1.2B$13.0M
Capital ratio14.75%15.39% (stronger)
Problem loans0.46%0.07% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.57%-0.08% (stronger)
Return on assets1.15%1.78% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits87.2%61.6% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits34.8%0.0% (stronger)
Offices101
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)11.0%—

I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (98 vs 81). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Washington Financial Bank leads on 0 and I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union on 7. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions