TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Waumandee State Bank vs Minnesota First Credit and Savings, Incorporated

Bank

Waumandee State Bank

Waumandee, Wisconsin · $100 million – $1 billion

67of 100
Moderate

Bank

Minnesota First Credit and Savings, Incorporated

Rochester, Minnesota · Under $100 million in assets

76of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureWaumandee State BankMinnesota First Credit and Savings, Incorporated
TellerScore6776 (stronger)
Capital cushion4492 (stronger)
Loan quality8096 (stronger)
Earnings66 (stronger)32
Funding & liquidity77 (stronger)54
Problem-loan coverage8999 (stronger)
Peer percentile34th56th
Total assets$345.5M$29.9M
Deposits / shares$301.2M$24.9M
Capital ratio9.39%14.16% (stronger)
Problem loans0.60%0.12% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.00%0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets1.16% (stronger)0.31%
Loans ÷ deposits83.2% (stronger)106.4%
Uninsured deposits9.4%0.2% (stronger)
Offices84
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Minnesota First Credit and Savings, Incorporated has the higher TellerScore (76 vs 67). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Waumandee State Bank leads on 2 and Minnesota First Credit and Savings, Incorporated on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions