Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association vs Mini-Cassia Empl. Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Wells Fargo Bank, National Association | Mini-Cassia Empl. Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 58 | 59 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 30 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 65 (stronger) | 19 |
| Earnings | 75 (stronger) | 27 |
| Funding & liquidity | 58 | 72 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 88 (stronger) | 83 |
| Peer percentile | 21st | 20th |
| Total assets | $1.9T | $574K |
| Deposits / shares | $1.6T | $483K |
| Capital ratio | 8.02% | 15.43% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 1.04% (stronger) | 2.42% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.40% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.38% (stronger) | 0.17% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 62.9% (stronger) | 87.8% |
| Uninsured deposits | 50.3% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 4,086 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 55,386 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 35.4 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 22.2% | — |
Mini-Cassia Empl. Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (59 vs 58). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Wells Fargo Bank, National Association leads on 3 and Mini-Cassia Empl. Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.