Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
WesBanco Bank, Inc. vs Washington Financial Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | WesBanco Bank, Inc. | Washington Financial Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 66 | 81 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 52 | 97 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 71 | 85 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 76 (stronger) | 66 |
| Funding & liquidity | 53 (stronger) | 51 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 92 | 95 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 58th | 91st |
| Total assets | $27.7B | $1.4B |
| Deposits / shares | $21.8B | $1.2B |
| Capital ratio | 10.25% | 14.75% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.86% | 0.46% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.09% (stronger) | 0.57% |
| Return on assets | 1.39% (stronger) | 1.15% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 88.7% | 87.2% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 32.2% (stronger) | 34.8% |
| Offices | 211 | 10 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 104 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 4.8 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 20.1% | 11.0% |
Washington Financial Bank has the higher TellerScore (81 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), WesBanco Bank, Inc. leads on 3 and Washington Financial Bank on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.