Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Wood & Huston Bank vs Bank 21
Metric by metric
| Measure | Wood & Huston Bank | Bank 21 |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 82 (stronger) | 79 |
| Capital cushion | 66 (stronger) | 65 |
| Loan quality | 95 | 98 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 100 | 100 |
| Funding & liquidity | 55 (stronger) | 37 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 97 (stronger) | 91 |
| Peer percentile | 93rd | 75th |
| Total assets | $1.2B | $202.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.1B | $164.7M |
| Capital ratio | 11.55% (stronger) | 11.51% |
| Problem loans | 0.14% | 0.05% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.06% | -0.04% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 2.08% | 2.72% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 90.9% (stronger) | 109.6% |
| Uninsured deposits | 27.9% | 27.1% (stronger) |
| Offices | 11 | 5 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 3.4% | — |
Wood & Huston Bank has the higher TellerScore (82 vs 79). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Wood & Huston Bank leads on 3 and Bank 21 on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.