TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Wright Patman Congressional Federal Credit Union vs Lee Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Wright Patman Congressional Federal Credit Union

Washington, District of Columbia · $1 billion – $10 billion

61of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Lee Federal Credit Union

Washington, District of Columbia · Under $100 million in assets

99of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureWright Patman Congressional Federal Credit UnionLee Federal Credit Union
TellerScore6199 (stronger)
Capital cushion60100 (stronger)
Loan quality46100 (stronger)
Earnings5295 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity89100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage81100 (stronger)
Peer percentile27th99th
Total assets$1.3B$5.5M
Deposits / shares$1.1B$2.7M
Capital ratio11.04%50.68% (stronger)
Problem loans1.62%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.18%0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets0.80%1.86% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits70.3%44.8% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits15.6%0.0% (stronger)
Offices51
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)18.3%—

Lee Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (99 vs 61). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Wright Patman Congressional Federal Credit Union leads on 0 and Lee Federal Credit Union on 7. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions