Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Zions Bancorporation, N.A. vs Mini-Cassia Empl. Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Zions Bancorporation, N.A. | Mini-Cassia Empl. Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 67 (stronger) | 59 |
| Capital cushion | 44 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 84 (stronger) | 19 |
| Earnings | 82 (stronger) | 27 |
| Funding & liquidity | 45 | 72 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 93 (stronger) | 83 |
| Peer percentile | 63rd | 20th |
| Total assets | $89.0B | $574K |
| Deposits / shares | $76.6B | $483K |
| Capital ratio | 9.43% | 15.43% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.47% (stronger) | 2.42% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.04% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.55% (stronger) | 0.17% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 80.8% (stronger) | 87.8% |
| Uninsured deposits | 46.2% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 407 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 363 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 4.7 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 30.7% | — |
Zions Bancorporation, N.A. has the higher TellerScore (67 vs 59). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Zions Bancorporation, N.A. leads on 4 and Mini-Cassia Empl. Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.