Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Zions Bancorporation, N.A. vs Wiremen'S Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Zions Bancorporation, N.A. | Wiremen'S Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 67 | 92 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 44 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 84 | 96 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 82 (stronger) | 63 |
| Funding & liquidity | 45 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 93 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 63rd | 92nd |
| Total assets | $89.0B | $40.6M |
| Deposits / shares | $76.6B | $33.5M |
| Capital ratio | 9.43% | 17.01% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.47% | 0.11% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.04% | -0.08% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.55% (stronger) | 1.07% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 80.8% | 51.9% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 46.2% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 407 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 363 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 4.7 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 30.7% | — |
Wiremen'S Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (92 vs 67). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Zions Bancorporation, N.A. leads on 1 and Wiremen'S Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.