TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Accentra Credit Union vs Austin City Employees Credit Union

Credit union

Accentra Credit Union

Austin, Minnesota · $100 million – $1 billion

61of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Austin City Employees Credit Union

Austin, Minnesota · Under $100 million in assets

97of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureAccentra Credit UnionAustin City Employees Credit Union
TellerScore6197 (stronger)
Capital cushion57100 (stronger)
Loan quality48100 (stronger)
Earnings5594 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity8789 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage79100 (stronger)
Peer percentile24th98th
Total assets$208.2M$11.6M
Deposits / shares$186.4M$9.3M
Capital ratio10.67%19.09% (stronger)
Problem loans1.57%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs1.21%0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets0.88%1.86% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits72.8%71.5% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits4.0%2.9% (stronger)
Offices31
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)14.5%—

Austin City Employees Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (97 vs 61). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Accentra Credit Union leads on 0 and Austin City Employees Credit Union on 7. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions