TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Accentra Credit Union vs Expedition Credit Union

Credit union

Accentra Credit Union

Austin, Minnesota · $100 million – $1 billion

61of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Expedition Credit Union

Mendota Heights, Minnesota · $100 million – $1 billion

66of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureAccentra Credit UnionExpedition Credit Union
TellerScore6166 (stronger)
Capital cushion57 (stronger)49
Loan quality4889 (stronger)
Earnings55 (stronger)21
Funding & liquidity87100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage7996 (stronger)
Peer percentile24th37th
Total assets$208.2M$223.5M
Deposits / shares$186.4M$200.8M
Capital ratio10.67% (stronger)9.95%
Problem loans1.57%0.34% (stronger)
Net charge-offs1.21%0.39% (stronger)
Return on assets0.88% (stronger)0.03%
Loans ÷ deposits72.8%59.5% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits4.0% (stronger)5.8%
Offices34
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)14.5%18.1%

Expedition Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (66 vs 61). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Accentra Credit Union leads on 3 and Expedition Credit Union on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions