Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Alpine Bank vs Nuvista Federal Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Alpine Bank | Nuvista Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 73 | 92 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 60 | 93 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 90 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 72 (stronger) | 68 |
| Funding & liquidity | 59 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 96 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 70th | 97th |
| Total assets | $6.7B | $172.3M |
| Deposits / shares | $5.9B | $146.8M |
| Capital ratio | 11.02% | 14.33% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.31% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.12% | 0.04% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.29% (stronger) | 1.21% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 75.0% | 47.8% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 38.5% | 9.5% (stronger) |
| Offices | 40 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 13.2% | — |
Nuvista Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (92 vs 73). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Alpine Bank leads on 1 and Nuvista Federal Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.