Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Altana Federal Credit Union vs Park Side Financial Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Altana Federal Credit Union | Park Side Financial Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 66 | 68 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 62 (stronger) | 44 |
| Loan quality | 68 | 93 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 55 (stronger) | 47 |
| Funding & liquidity | 74 | 83 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 87 | 97 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 37th | 45th |
| Total assets | $668.3M | $390.4M |
| Deposits / shares | $590.1M | $350.6M |
| Capital ratio | 11.24% (stronger) | 9.37% |
| Problem loans | 0.96% | 0.20% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.22% | 0.12% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.89% (stronger) | 0.67% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 86.5% | 77.3% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 9.2% | 6.2% (stronger) |
| Offices | 6 | 8 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 19.1% | — |
Park Side Financial Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (68 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Altana Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and Park Side Financial Credit Union on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.