Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Amerasia Bank vs Portrait Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Amerasia Bank | Portrait Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 78 | 79 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 100 | 100 |
| Loan quality | 47 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 92 (stronger) | 0 |
| Funding & liquidity | 64 | 96 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 85 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 86th | 63rd |
| Total assets | $1.1B | $44.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $914.0M | $594K |
| Capital ratio | 15.12% | 99.23% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 1.59% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.02% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.79% (stronger) | -8.27% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 89.1% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 21.9% | 18.5% (stronger) |
| Offices | 8 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Portrait Bank has the higher TellerScore (79 vs 78). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Amerasia Bank leads on 1 and Portrait Bank on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.