TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Andrew Johnson Bank vs Greeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union

Bank

Andrew Johnson Bank

Greeneville, Tennessee · $100 million – $1 billion

73of 100
Strong

Credit union

Greeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union

Greeneville, Tennessee · Under $100 million in assets

86of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureAndrew Johnson BankGreeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union
TellerScore7386 (stronger)
Capital cushion62100 (stronger)
Loan quality72100 (stronger)
Earnings82 (stronger)68
Funding & liquidity71 (stronger)50
Problem-loan coverage89100 (stronger)
Peer percentile53rd80th
Total assets$611.9M$1.8M
Deposits / shares$545.9M$848K
Capital ratio11.24%52.15% (stronger)
Problem loans0.83%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.00%-0.32% (stronger)
Return on assets1.54% (stronger)1.21%
Loans ÷ deposits81.8% (stronger)122.2%
Uninsured deposits21.9%0.0% (stronger)
Offices81
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Greeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (86 vs 73). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Andrew Johnson Bank leads on 2 and Greeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions