Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Auburn Banking Company vs The Salyersville National Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Auburn Banking Company | The Salyersville National Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 65 | 89 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 33 | 92 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 78 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 86 (stronger) | 85 |
| Funding & liquidity | 67 (stronger) | 66 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 87 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 29th | 94th |
| Total assets | $164.3M | $163.5M |
| Deposits / shares | $149.8M | $125.2M |
| Capital ratio | 8.26% | 14.24% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.65% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.02% (stronger) | 0.06% |
| Return on assets | 1.65% (stronger) | 1.64% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 83.4% | 80.2% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 24.1% (stronger) | 27.6% |
| Offices | 3 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
The Salyersville National Bank has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 65). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Auburn Banking Company leads on 3 and The Salyersville National Bank on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.