Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Bank of Camilla vs Ameris Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Bank of Camilla | Ameris Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 89 (stronger) | 67 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 64 |
| Loan quality | 88 (stronger) | 81 |
| Earnings | 82 (stronger) | 69 |
| Funding & liquidity | 72 (stronger) | 28 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 (stronger) | 94 |
| Peer percentile | 94th | 63rd |
| Total assets | $188.1M | $28.4B |
| Deposits / shares | $147.6M | $22.7B |
| Capital ratio | 20.79% (stronger) | 11.41% |
| Problem loans | 0.37% (stronger) | 0.57% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.20% |
| Return on assets | 1.54% (stronger) | 1.23% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 86.1% (stronger) | 98.3% |
| Uninsured deposits | 17.0% (stronger) | 45.6% |
| Offices | 1 | 164 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | 272 |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | 12.0 |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 10.5% |
Bank of Camilla has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 67). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank of Camilla leads on 7 and Ameris Bank on 0. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.