Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Bank of China vs Paul Quinn Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Paul Quinn Federal Credit Union
Jamaica, New York · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Bank of China | Paul Quinn Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 25 | 93 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 0 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 46 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 20 | 65 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 45 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | — | 100 |
| Peer percentile | 1st | 94th |
| Total assets | $48.5B | $358K |
| Deposits / shares | $24.7B | $251K |
| Capital ratio | 0.00% | 26.10% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 1.63% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 0.00% | 1.12% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 71.1% | 19.1% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 54.9% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Paul Quinn Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (93 vs 25). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank of China leads on 0 and Paul Quinn Federal Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.