Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Bank of Gleason vs The Bank of Milan
Metric by metric
| Measure | Bank of Gleason | The Bank of Milan |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 90 (stronger) | 72 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 45 |
| Loan quality | 95 (stronger) | 67 |
| Earnings | 68 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 88 | 91 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 96 (stronger) | 84 |
| Peer percentile | 95th | 50th |
| Total assets | $138.5M | $101.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $113.2M | $88.9M |
| Capital ratio | 20.86% (stronger) | 9.52% |
| Problem loans | 0.14% (stronger) | 0.99% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.01% | -0.01% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.19% | 1.99% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 71.1% | 69.0% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 16.0% | 7.4% (stronger) |
| Offices | 2 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Bank of Gleason has the higher TellerScore (90 vs 72). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank of Gleason leads on 3 and The Bank of Milan on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.