Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Bank of Labor vs The Bank of Grain Valley
Metric by metric
| Measure | Bank of Labor | The Bank of Grain Valley |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 41 | 95 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 30 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 0 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 56 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 (stronger) | 64 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 59 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 2nd | 99th |
| Total assets | $1.1B | $110.6M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.0B | $85.3M |
| Capital ratio | 7.99% | 23.96% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 3.15% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | -0.01% (stronger) | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 0.91% | 2.14% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 34.6% (stronger) | 77.1% |
| Uninsured deposits | 15.6% (stronger) | 32.1% |
| Offices | 5 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
The Bank of Grain Valley has the higher TellerScore (95 vs 41). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank of Labor leads on 3 and The Bank of Grain Valley on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.