TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

BankGloucester vs Charles River Bank

Bank

BankGloucester

Gloucester, Massachusetts · $100 million – $1 billion

30of 100
Low

Bank

Charles River Bank

Medway, Massachusetts · $100 million – $1 billion

57of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureBankGloucesterCharles River Bank
TellerScore3057 (stronger)
Capital cushion37 (stronger)29
Loan quality184 (stronger)
Earnings37 (stronger)36
Funding & liquidity4270 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage4591 (stronger)
Peer percentile1st14th
Total assets$386.9M$336.1M
Deposits / shares$304.2M$312.6M
Capital ratio8.70% (stronger)7.93%
Problem loans2.98%0.47% (stronger)
Net charge-offs-0.00%-0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets0.42% (stronger)0.41%
Loans ÷ deposits108.9%73.8% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits23.7% (stronger)29.6%
Offices33
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—28.0%

Charles River Bank has the higher TellerScore (57 vs 30). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), BankGloucester leads on 3 and Charles River Bank on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions