TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Blue Grass Savings Bank vs I. H. Mississippi Valley Credit Union

Bank

Blue Grass Savings Bank

Blue Grass, Iowa · $100 million – $1 billion

89of 100
Very strong

Credit union

I. H. Mississippi Valley Credit Union

Moline, Illinois · $1 billion – $10 billion

61of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureBlue Grass Savings BankI. H. Mississippi Valley Credit Union
TellerScore89 (stronger)61
Capital cushion93 (stronger)41
Loan quality89 (stronger)71
Earnings72 (stronger)65
Funding & liquidity98 (stronger)67
Problem-loan coverage98 (stronger)83
Peer percentile94th27th
Total assets$225.5M$2.3B
Deposits / shares$185.6M$2.0B
Capital ratio14.30% (stronger)9.12%
Problem loans0.34% (stronger)0.86%
Net charge-offs-0.01% (stronger)1.04%
Return on assets1.31% (stronger)1.11%
Loans ÷ deposits61.8% (stronger)93.5%
Uninsured deposits12.6%9.0% (stronger)
Offices212
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)0.0%14.5%

Blue Grass Savings Bank has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 61). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Blue Grass Savings Bank leads on 6 and I. H. Mississippi Valley Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions