TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Building Trades Federal Credit Union vs Expedition Credit Union

Credit union

Building Trades Federal Credit Union

Maple Grove, Minnesota · $100 million – $1 billion

73of 100
Strong

Credit union

Expedition Credit Union

Mendota Heights, Minnesota · $100 million – $1 billion

66of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureBuilding Trades Federal Credit UnionExpedition Credit Union
TellerScore73 (stronger)66
Capital cushion59 (stronger)49
Loan quality90 (stronger)89
Earnings63 (stronger)21
Funding & liquidity79100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage7996 (stronger)
Peer percentile60th37th
Total assets$249.9M$223.5M
Deposits / shares$217.5M$200.8M
Capital ratio10.92% (stronger)9.95%
Problem loans0.29% (stronger)0.34%
Net charge-offs0.28% (stronger)0.39%
Return on assets1.08% (stronger)0.03%
Loans ÷ deposits71.2%59.5% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits23.8%5.8% (stronger)
Offices34
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)7.9%18.1%

Building Trades Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (73 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Building Trades Federal Credit Union leads on 5 and Expedition Credit Union on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions