TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

California Adventist Federal Credit Union vs Northrop Grumman Federal Credit Union

Credit union

California Adventist Federal Credit Union

Glendale, California · Under $100 million in assets

89of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Northrop Grumman Federal Credit Union

Gardena, California · $1 billion – $10 billion

53of 100
Below average

Metric by metric

MeasureCalifornia Adventist Federal Credit UnionNorthrop Grumman Federal Credit Union
TellerScore89 (stronger)53
Capital cushion100 (stronger)41
Loan quality99 (stronger)46
Earnings57 (stronger)28
Funding & liquidity84100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)82
Peer percentile87th10th
Total assets$44.7M$1.6B
Deposits / shares$35.5M$1.5B
Capital ratio20.11% (stronger)9.08%
Problem loans0.04% (stronger)1.62%
Net charge-offs-0.02% (stronger)0.69%
Return on assets0.92% (stronger)0.21%
Loans ÷ deposits76.0%55.8% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits0.8% (stronger)8.3%
Offices119
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—21.0%

California Adventist Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 53). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), California Adventist Federal Credit Union leads on 6 and Northrop Grumman Federal Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions