TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Cascade Federal Credit Union vs Ibew & United Workers Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Cascade Federal Credit Union

Kent, Washington · $100 million – $1 billion

88of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Ibew & United Workers Federal Credit Union

Portland, Oregon · $100 million – $1 billion

59of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureCascade Federal Credit UnionIbew & United Workers Federal Credit Union
TellerScore88 (stronger)59
Capital cushion83 (stronger)64
Loan quality74 (stronger)60
Earnings100 (stronger)22
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)80
Problem-loan coverage93 (stronger)87
Peer percentile92nd19th
Total assets$392.6M$112.7M
Deposits / shares$339.4M$99.8M
Capital ratio13.31% (stronger)11.43%
Problem loans0.79% (stronger)1.20%
Net charge-offs0.28% (stronger)0.78%
Return on assets2.44% (stronger)0.05%
Loans ÷ deposits53.5% (stronger)71.6%
Uninsured deposits13.5% (stronger)23.2%
Offices31
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)0.0%—

Cascade Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 59). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Cascade Federal Credit Union leads on 7 and Ibew & United Workers Federal Credit Union on 0. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions