TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Cascade Federal Credit Union vs Longshoremen'S Local 4 Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Cascade Federal Credit Union

Kent, Washington · $100 million – $1 billion

88of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Longshoremen'S Local 4 Federal Credit Union

Vancouver, Washington · Under $100 million in assets

94of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureCascade Federal Credit UnionLongshoremen'S Local 4 Federal Credit Union
TellerScore8894 (stronger)
Capital cushion83100 (stronger)
Loan quality7489 (stronger)
Earnings100 (stronger)85
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)97
Problem-loan coverage9399 (stronger)
Peer percentile92nd95th
Total assets$392.6M$39.3M
Deposits / shares$339.4M$29.7M
Capital ratio13.31%23.84% (stronger)
Problem loans0.79%0.33% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.28%0.03% (stronger)
Return on assets2.44% (stronger)1.62%
Loans ÷ deposits53.5% (stronger)63.0%
Uninsured deposits13.5%12.6% (stronger)
Offices31
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)0.0%—

Longshoremen'S Local 4 Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (94 vs 88). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Cascade Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and Longshoremen'S Local 4 Federal Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions