TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Cascade Federal Credit Union vs Machinists - Boilermakers Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Cascade Federal Credit Union

Kent, Washington · $100 million – $1 billion

88of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Machinists - Boilermakers Federal Credit Union

Gladstone, Oregon · Under $100 million in assets

52of 100
Below average

Metric by metric

MeasureCascade Federal Credit UnionMachinists - Boilermakers Federal Credit Union
TellerScore88 (stronger)52
Capital cushion8386 (stronger)
Loan quality74 (stronger)23
Earnings100 (stronger)22
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)57
Problem-loan coverage93 (stronger)71
Peer percentile92nd11th
Total assets$392.6M$3.2M
Deposits / shares$339.4M$2.8M
Capital ratio13.31%13.62% (stronger)
Problem loans0.79% (stronger)2.30%
Net charge-offs0.28%0.10% (stronger)
Return on assets2.44% (stronger)0.04%
Loans ÷ deposits53.5% (stronger)103.6%
Uninsured deposits13.5%4.9% (stronger)
Offices32
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)0.0%—

Cascade Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 52). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Cascade Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and Machinists - Boilermakers Federal Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions