TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Cascade Federal Credit Union vs Mt. Rainier Credit Union

Credit union

Cascade Federal Credit Union

Kent, Washington · $100 million – $1 billion

88of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Mt. Rainier Credit Union

Puyallup, Washington · Under $100 million in assets

74of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureCascade Federal Credit UnionMt. Rainier Credit Union
TellerScore88 (stronger)74
Capital cushion8384 (stronger)
Loan quality7476 (stronger)
Earnings100 (stronger)25
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage9397 (stronger)
Peer percentile92nd49th
Total assets$392.6M$26.3M
Deposits / shares$339.4M$22.8M
Capital ratio13.31%13.36% (stronger)
Problem loans0.79%0.72% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.28%0.12% (stronger)
Return on assets2.44% (stronger)0.11%
Loans ÷ deposits53.5%31.6% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits13.5%4.2% (stronger)
Offices31
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)0.0%—

Cascade Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 74). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Cascade Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and Mt. Rainier Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions