Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Cass Commercial Bank vs Edward Jones Trust Company
Metric by metric
| Measure | Cass Commercial Bank | Edward Jones Trust Company |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 83 | 94 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 91 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 95 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 100 | 100 |
| Funding & liquidity | 17 | 61 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 94th | 98th |
| Total assets | $1.3B | $160.5M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.1B | $500K |
| Capital ratio | 14.10% | 98.18% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.16% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 2.23% | 8.54% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 93.1% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 64.8% | 50.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 2 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Edward Jones Trust Company has the higher TellerScore (94 vs 83). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Cass Commercial Bank leads on 0 and Edward Jones Trust Company on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.