Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Cass Commercial Bank vs The Nodaway Valley Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Cass Commercial Bank | The Nodaway Valley Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 83 | 87 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 91 (stronger) | 66 |
| Loan quality | 95 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 100 | 100 |
| Funding & liquidity | 17 | 80 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 94th | 98th |
| Total assets | $1.3B | $1.6B |
| Deposits / shares | $1.1B | $1.4B |
| Capital ratio | 14.10% (stronger) | 11.56% |
| Problem loans | 0.16% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | -0.04% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 2.23% (stronger) | 2.23% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 93.1% | 73.3% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 64.8% | 21.2% (stronger) |
| Offices | 2 | 9 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 5.8% |
The Nodaway Valley Bank has the higher TellerScore (87 vs 83). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Cass Commercial Bank leads on 2 and The Nodaway Valley Bank on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.