Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Cattlemens Bank vs BancFirst
Metric by metric
| Measure | Cattlemens Bank | BancFirst |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 68 | 71 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 53 | 56 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 90 (stronger) | 60 |
| Earnings | 72 | 90 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 41 | 83 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 95 (stronger) | 86 |
| Peer percentile | 37th | 76th |
| Total assets | $595.2M | $12.8B |
| Deposits / shares | $468.9M | $11.2B |
| Capital ratio | 10.28% | 10.63% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.29% (stronger) | 1.19% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.00% (stronger) | 0.11% |
| Return on assets | 1.30% | 1.75% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 111.0% | 63.8% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 23.6% (stronger) | 27.1% |
| Offices | 7 | 94 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | 55 |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | 4.9 |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 15.8% | 10.2% |
BancFirst has the higher TellerScore (71 vs 68). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Cattlemens Bank leads on 3 and BancFirst on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.