Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
CerescoBank vs Lincoln FSB of Nebraska
Metric by metric
| Measure | CerescoBank | Lincoln FSB of Nebraska |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 92 (stronger) | 69 |
| Capital cushion | 89 (stronger) | 67 |
| Loan quality | 98 (stronger) | 85 |
| Earnings | 81 (stronger) | 35 |
| Funding & liquidity | 97 (stronger) | 74 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 94 |
| Peer percentile | 92nd | 40th |
| Total assets | $81.3M | $387.3M |
| Deposits / shares | $69.0M | $326.5M |
| Capital ratio | 13.85% (stronger) | 11.70% |
| Problem loans | 0.06% (stronger) | 0.46% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.04% | -0.05% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.52% (stronger) | 0.38% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 63.3% (stronger) | 86.2% |
| Uninsured deposits | 13.7% | 8.3% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 13 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 3.3% |
CerescoBank has the higher TellerScore (92 vs 69). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), CerescoBank leads on 5 and Lincoln FSB of Nebraska on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.