Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
CerescoBank vs Scribner Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | CerescoBank | Scribner Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 92 | 96 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 89 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 98 | 99 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 81 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 97 (stronger) | 76 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 | 100 |
| Peer percentile | 92nd | 97th |
| Total assets | $81.3M | $86.9M |
| Deposits / shares | $69.0M | $72.1M |
| Capital ratio | 13.85% | 16.56% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.06% | 0.04% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.04% | -0.12% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.52% | 2.73% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 63.3% (stronger) | 78.8% |
| Uninsured deposits | 13.7% (stronger) | 19.6% |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Scribner Bank has the higher TellerScore (96 vs 92). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), CerescoBank leads on 2 and Scribner Bank on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.