Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Chickasaw Community Bank vs Cattlemens Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Chickasaw Community Bank | Cattlemens Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 47 | 68 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 60 (stronger) | 53 |
| Loan quality | 7 | 90 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 46 | 72 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 73 (stronger) | 41 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 72 | 95 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 5th | 37th |
| Total assets | $557.1M | $595.2M |
| Deposits / shares | $490.0M | $468.9M |
| Capital ratio | 11.03% (stronger) | 10.28% |
| Problem loans | 2.78% | 0.29% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | -0.01% (stronger) | -0.00% |
| Return on assets | 0.66% | 1.30% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 65.4% (stronger) | 111.0% |
| Uninsured deposits | 35.0% | 23.6% (stronger) |
| Offices | 5 | 7 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 34.1% | 15.8% |
Cattlemens Bank has the higher TellerScore (68 vs 47). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Chickasaw Community Bank leads on 3 and Cattlemens Bank on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.