Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Chippewa Valley Bank vs Superior Savings Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Chippewa Valley Bank | Superior Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 74 | 74 |
| Capital cushion | 37 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 93 (stronger) | 62 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 54 |
| Funding & liquidity | 65 (stronger) | 56 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 97 (stronger) | 90 |
| Peer percentile | 57th | 51st |
| Total assets | $735.8M | $98.8M |
| Deposits / shares | $559.0M | $81.4M |
| Capital ratio | 8.74% | 16.30% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.22% (stronger) | 1.15% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 2.05% (stronger) | 0.85% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 94.7% (stronger) | 100.1% |
| Uninsured deposits | 15.4% (stronger) | 18.7% |
| Offices | 13 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 6.3% | 4.4% |
Both have the same TellerScore. On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Chippewa Valley Bank leads on 4 and Superior Savings Bank on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.