TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Chrome Federal Credit Union vs I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Chrome Federal Credit Union

Canonsburg, Pennsylvania · $100 million – $1 billion

77of 100
Strong

Credit union

I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

98of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureChrome Federal Credit UnionI.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union
TellerScore7798 (stronger)
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality7098 (stronger)
Earnings4391 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity7899 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage92100 (stronger)
Peer percentile71st98th
Total assets$223.6M$15.4M
Deposits / shares$188.0M$13.0M
Capital ratio15.31%15.39% (stronger)
Problem loans0.89%0.07% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.28%-0.08% (stronger)
Return on assets0.58%1.78% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits82.1%61.6% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits4.5%0.0% (stronger)
Offices51
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (98 vs 77). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Chrome Federal Credit Union leads on 0 and I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union on 7. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions