TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Cincinnati Interagency Federal Credit Union vs Latvian Cleveland Credit Union

Credit union

Cincinnati Interagency Federal Credit Union

Cincinnati, Ohio · Under $100 million in assets

92of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Latvian Cleveland Credit Union

Lakewood, Ohio · Under $100 million in assets

85of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureCincinnati Interagency Federal Credit UnionLatvian Cleveland Credit Union
TellerScore92 (stronger)85
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality73100 (stronger)
Earnings98 (stronger)36
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)85
Problem-loan coverage96100 (stronger)
Peer percentile92nd77th
Total assets$30.8M$28.1M
Deposits / shares$24.9M$22.3M
Capital ratio18.24%20.31% (stronger)
Problem loans0.82%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.56%0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets1.96% (stronger)0.40%
Loans ÷ deposits49.5% (stronger)74.9%
Uninsured deposits2.1% (stronger)4.0%
Offices21
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Cincinnati Interagency Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (92 vs 85). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Cincinnati Interagency Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and Latvian Cleveland Credit Union on 3. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions